Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 3, 2026 at 5:40 pm in reply to: Module 5: Looking Back and Looking Forward Scientific Heritage and Art #254481
I think this is a great idea CJ. It is wonderful to use native species and learn about them whilst doing that. Children have ownership over this project and have to make appropriate decisions. Using bottle caps as an art mural is also a fantastic idea and there would be a real living space of nature, Art and beauty around the school.
July 3, 2026 at 5:37 pm in reply to: Module 5: Looking Back and Looking Forward Scientific Heritage and Art #254476Question 2
I’d lead a creative, place-based project about Roscommon’s Landscape, blending art, music, drama, and writing around our natural and scientific heritage: the River Suck and Shannon, wetlands and bog restoration, local limestone, and Roscommon Castle.
Sensing place: We’d take a short “noticing walk” to sketch textures (reeds, stone, water ripples) and collect sound snippets on iPads—birds, wind, flowing water. Back in class, pupils create charcoal rubbings of stone and plants, building a shared “texture library.”
Transforming to art: In groups, pupils compose soundscapes from their recordings (layered loops and body percussion) and design mixed‑media collages using the rubbings plus watercolour “maps” of the river or bog. A drama tableau sequence shows the landscape across time: limestone forming, people settling, castle building, peatland draining and restoring.
Words and performance: Pupils write short free‑verse poems or monologues from the viewpoint of a river, a curlew, or a stone in the castle wall, weaving in science vocabulary (habitat, limestone, restoration, biodiversity). We stage a gallery-walk performance: collages displayed, soundscapes playing, pupils performing their pieces. This celebrates local heritage, builds creative confidence, and deepens scientific understanding through the arts.
I think this is a fabulous idea and children are using what’s right on their doorstep as inspiration for learning. Using lego is a great idea and from my experience children love using it and this gives them a meaningful way to use it in the classroom. The key questions are very interesting and require thought.
Project title Engineering Roscommon: Design a Strong, Stable Structure Inspired by Roscommon Castle
Big idea and question
Big idea: Engineers design with forces, materials, and constraints in mind.
Driving question: How can we build a castle‑inspired model that is strong, stable, and fit for a modern purpose?Explore (History/SESE + Science)
Look at photos/virtual tour of Roscommon Castle.
Notice features: thick walls, arches, towers, battlements, buttresses.
Mini‑demo: books as “walls” vs a paper arch under compression.
Vocabulary: force, load, compression, tension, stability, foundation.
Plan like an engineer (Maths + Visual Art)
Design brief: Build a gatehouse/tower/curtain‑wall section that:supports a 1 kg mass for 10 seconds,
survives a side “wind test” (fan/hairdryer),
uses a limited “budget”.
Choose materials and predict weak points.
Build (Science/Engineering)
Materials: recycled cardboard, paper tubes, straws/skewers, string, tape, card triangles for bracing.
Techniques mini‑lesson: triangulation, buttresses, layering arches, wide base.
Rapid prototype → quick test → improve.
Test and iterate (Maths + Science)
Test rig: add weights gradually; record max load; wind test; “siege” marble roll for parapets.
Pupils graph results (bar chart: design vs load held).
Identify where it failed and reinforce.
Communicate and connect (English + Art + SESE)
Create a poster or 60‑second video: “How Roscommon Castle inspired our design.”
Label force paths, reinforcements, and one change after testing.
Option: propose a modern community use (ticket kiosk/mini‑pavilion) linking heritage and today.
Constraints and criteriaConstraints: base fits on A3; 40 “budget tokens” for materials; build time 2 lessons.
Success criteria: stability, load capacity, neat construction, clear explanation, heritage feature included (arch/tower/battlements).
DifferentiationScaffolds: joint/arch menu cards; sentence starters for explanations.
Extension: add a working drawbridge or simple truss roof.
AssessmentRubric: applies force ideas, plans with sketches, tests and improves, communicates clearly.
Evidence: sketches, load graph, photo sequence, final poster/video.
Local links and safetyReference Roscommon Castle’s limestone and site choice (firm ground, visibility).
Safety: no blades for pupils; hot‑glue by adult; goggles for “siege” test.
Outcome Pupils connect a local landmark to real engineering—planning, testing, failing safely, and improving—while integrating History, Science, Maths, English, and Art.You have listed some great ideas here to encourage biodiversity at school. I think the idea of planting wildflowers is lovely as well as the bug hotels. Allowing the children to take care of these areas gives them ownership and will make the children have a desire to support biodiversity in their future lives.
I’d run a year-long “Our School Biodiversity” project with a simple observe–record–reflect cycle each term.
Resources and recording sheets:
Field guides (Irish birds/insects/plants), ID apps (Seek/iNaturalist with consent), magnifiers, quadrat string, thermometers, rain gauge.
Recording sheets: monthly species log (date, weather, habitat, species, count, photo/sketch), habitat survey checklist (pollinator plants, deadwood, nesting sites), seasonal phenology chart (first buds/flowers/insects/birds), and an action log (what we changed and why).Outdoor frequency:
ortnightly mini-surveys (15–20 minutes) plus one longer seasonal audit each term. Quick “noticing walks” after weather events to capture change.
Integration:Science/Geography: habitats, food webs, local maps of sightings.
Maths: tally charts, bar/line graphs of species counts; averages and trends.English: nature journals, explanation texts, persuasive letters (e.g., to create a pollinator patch).
Art: sketching species, leaf rubbings; DT: building bug hotels/bird feeders from recycled materials.
SPHE/Ethics: stewardship, risk‑benefit discussions.
Digital: shared class spreadsheet, photo portfolio, and simple dashboards.
Culminate with a school exhibition comparing autumn–winter–spring–summer data and proposing one practical improvement for next year.I think you have some great ideas here Anna. I like the idea of using trundle wheels and linking in with Maths. It is also a great idea to share your results so children have a function to their learning and makes their work feel cherished and worthwhile.
For infants/1st class, I’d plan a playful, concrete-to-digital sequence. Begin with a “treasure hunt” on the classroom floor: place three landmarks (reading corner, door, teacher’s desk) and model simple positional language (near, far, left, right, beside). Pupils draw a bird’s‑eye “map” of the room using shapes and a three‑symbol key. We co-construct a class map on chart paper, add a north arrow, and practice following/creating two‑step directions.
Next, step outside to map the yard: identify 4–5 features (gate, shelter, tree, pitch). Pupils sketch quick outlines, then compare to a printed outline plan (if available) to notice scale and orientation.
Bring this into digital: on Google Maps, locate the school, turn on satellite view, and toggle labels to spot our features. Use the “measure distance” tool to compare yard length to classroom length (rounded to nearest metre). On GeoHive (Map Viewer), switch basemaps (aerial vs. street), add a simple point marker for the school, and discuss why maps change with scale.
Assessment and differentiation: provide symbol cards and pre-drawn boxes for emerging writers; challenge confident learners to add a simple route with arrows and write two instructions. Close with a quick “map talk” where pupils explain their key and one mapping choice.
I agree with your thoughts Katie. There are some great resources in this module that would be very beneficial in the teaching of STEM subjects. As you have highlighted, there are many opportunities for integration across the curriculum which only benefits the childrens’ learning. I think it is crucial that children have hands-on activities in order to give them stronger understanding as you have emphasised.
Liston’s call to move “beyond the acronym” sharpened my lens: in my 5th Class, STEM is less four silos and more an integrated way of noticing, questioning, and designing with purpose. A typical unit begins with a real context—energy use in our school, water quality in a local stream, or accessibility on our yard. Pupils frame investigable questions, plan fair tests, gather and analyse data (spreadsheets, simple sensors or manual logs), iterate a design or action, and communicate findings through graphs, reports, and short videos. Technology is both a thinking tool (data handling, coding micro‑controllers where feasible) and an audience bridge (sharing dashboards and explainers), not a reward at the end.
Engineering design brings trade‑offs to the surface: criteria, constraints, and evidence‑based decisions. Maths lives inside every step—measures, averages, error checks—rather than as a separate worksheet. Science anchors claims in observable patterns and models. Reflection journals and pupil voice surveys make the learning visible and guide next steps. Success looks like transfer: students applying the same inquiry‑design cycle to new problems, collaborating productively, and justifying choices with data and ethics, not just correct answers.
Living and teaching in Roscommon, I see sustainability expressed in quiet, practical ways that fit a rural county’s rhythm. Community-led tidy towns groups manage pollinator-friendly planting; farmers adopt hedgerow conservation, buffer strips, and nutrient management; local markets and farm shops shorten supply chains; GAA clubs and schools run bottle‑refill stations and textile or e‑waste collections. Boardwalks and greenways nudge active travel, while bog restoration projects and tree planting days show how land can heal and store carbon. These aren’t abstract ideas—they are places and people my pupils know.
To bring this into 5th Class, I’d frame a place-based inquiry: What makes our area more sustainable this term? Pupils could map local initiatives on a shared “Sustainability of Roscommon” wall map, interview a farmer or tidy towns volunteer, and conduct simple audits—litter counts, biodiversity spotters around hedgerows, water-use checks in school. In Maths, they would graph waste reductions; in Science/Geography, compare habitats and discuss peatland restoration. We’d design small interventions: a pollinator patch plan for the school grounds, a swap shop, or a poster campaign to reduce single-use plastics at matches. Reflection journals and presentations to the Board of Management or the parents’ association would close the loop—pupils seeing their voices shape real actions in their own community.
I agree with the points you have highlighted here Jessica. As I also from a rural background with links to farming, I can see the benefits of engaging children in this topic. It can be done at any class level and can be tailored for each age group. As you have mentioned, you want the children to gain from this experience and have a positive influence and attitude on their future lives.
You have made some great points here Tara. I feel that seafood is undervalued sometimes as a very nutritious food. I really like the idea of seeing where seafood is caught in Ireland. I think seafood should be more accessible. As you have mentioned, it is widely available in coastal areas but not as plentiful in other areas.
Teaching 5th Class, I’ve found that exploring the nutrition of seafood opens a practical window into healthy eating, science, and local culture. Seafood offers high-quality protein and minerals like selenium and zinc—nutrients that support brain function, growth, and immunity. Reflecting on this, I see how pupils benefit when “nutrition facts” become lived inquiry rather than memorised lists.
In class, I’d start with curiosity: What counts as seafood in Ireland? How often do families eat it? Pupils can compare labels from tinned salmon, mackerel, and tuna, identify allergens, and interpret portions. In Maths, they can graph omega‑3 content or price per 100 g; in Science, they can model digestion and discuss why oily fish differ from white fish. Geography connects us to Irish coasts and aquaculture; SPHE prompts reflections on balanced meals, sustainability, and cultural food preferences.
A tasting session (with consent and allergy protocols) using plain crackers and small samples—tinned mackerel, smoked salmon, seaweed snacks—can demystify flavours. Pupils can design “brain-boost” lunchbox ideas, write persuasive pieces on trying a new seafood, and evaluate sustainability labels. Throughout, we emphasise informed choice: nutrition, affordability, and environmental impact considered together.
I really like the idea of inviting a local agricultural producer to visit the school would be a great idea. It would make it more meaningful for the children and I think it would really engage them.. I think the creation of a marine or aquaculture team would be very proactive and highlight this topic even more.
-
AuthorPosts