Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 4, 2026 at 12:52 pm in reply to: SEN Module 1- Introduction to ICT & Assistive Technologies #254770
Hi Marie and welcome to the course!
Thank you for your engagement in Module 1. Your choice to upskill in ICT for SEN is highly relevant, and using Domain 1 of the Digital Learning Framework to focus on student learner outcomes is an excellent pedagogical approach. Your plan to utilise the SET framework at the start of the academic year is a fantastic, proactive strategy; analysing the student, environment, task, and tools ensures that decision-making around assistive technology remains entirely child-centred.
This dual-framework approach feeds beautifully into the School Self-Evaluation (SSE) process. By tracking how these assistive tools support curriculum access, you are generating clear evidence to evaluate the effectiveness of the school’s digital inclusion policies.
July 4, 2026 at 12:45 pm in reply to: Module 3 – Inclusive practice and assessment for learning using Google Workspace #254766Great reflection Carol! Your lesson structure provides an excellent cross-curricular link between English and Irish recount features, made highly engaging for 6th Class through the use of a real school tour photo.
Your approach to inclusion is strong; utilising audio recordings and labelled storyboards is a terrific way to reduce writing barriers and maintain high pupil engagement and of course these opportunities are the underpinning of the UDL.Your use of exit tickets ensures that your feedback loop is immediate and that your next steps remain entirely data-driven.
July 4, 2026 at 12:32 pm in reply to: Module 3 – Inclusive Practice with Learning Accelerators and Accessibility tools #254761Thank you for such a thoughtful post! I completely agree with your insights on how Copilot can tackle barriers to learning. It also supports embedding the concept of the UDL.
The ability to instantly generate scaffolded activities and simpler instructions is a massive win for differentiation and as you rightly pointed out, it saves us so much time when trying to cater to diverse literacy levels.
July 4, 2026 at 12:27 pm in reply to: Module 1 – Foundations of Microsoft 365, Copilot and responsible AI use in education #254758Hi Marguerite,
Welcome to the group and thanks for engaging with this module.
Your 4th Class water cycle lesson is a great example of using Copilot as a supportive launchpad rather than a finished product, relying on your own expertise to add visual supports and language adaptations. As GenAI becomes more prominent in society, this is a great approach.
I completely agree that while the efficiency of M365 Copilot is a massive benefit for reducing lesson prep time,. I agree that its tendency to produce generic or slightly inaccurate content is a major limitation.
Your strategy of prioritising pupil reasoning and discussion ensures that the cognitive load stays exactly where it belongs—with the children!
July 4, 2026 at 12:19 pm in reply to: Module 1 – Foundations of Microsoft 365, Copilot and responsible AI use in education #254754Hi Cormac,
Welcome to the course and thanks for engaging with this module.
Your analogy that AI is like an “enthusiastic child” requiring adult direction is absolutely spot-on and a fantastic takeaway. It underscores the vital role of the teacher’s professional judgment in reviewing and editing AI content.
Your approach to pupil autonomy is excellent. Having students prepare questions for Copilot so it acts as an aid rather than a “cheat sheet” is a great way to protect their critical thinking and problem-solving skills and also ensures the teacher maintains control of the AI tool
July 4, 2026 at 12:19 pm in reply to: Module 1 – Foundations of Microsoft 365, Copilot and responsible AI use in education #254753Hi Cormac,
Welcome to the course and thanks for engaging with this module.
Your analogy that AI is like an “enthusiastic child” requiring adult direction is absolutely spot-on and a fantastic takeaway. It underscores the vital role of the teacher’s professional judgment in reviewing and editing AI content.
Your approach to pupil autonomy is excellent. Having students prepare questions for Copilot so it acts as an aid rather than a “cheat sheet” is a great way to protect their critical thinking and problem-solving skills and also ensures the teacher maintains control of the AI tool
Hi Carol,
The “Living History” concept aligns perfectly with the 6th-class history curriculum, promoting active learning and community connection. This of course is a key feature of the new SEE specification of the PCF.
Your boundary for responsible AI use was well thought of; maintaining anonymity regarding the school and locality shows a strong understanding of GDPR and data privacy.
Integrating Google Workspace alongside creative presentation tools like Scratch and audio podcasts which can easily be done using Google Workspace or Canva is a brilliant way to address differentiation and the Digital Learning Framework within your School Self-Evaluation (SSE) goals!
Hi Jonathan,
Your focus on SDG7 and the idea of a student led “Energy Audit” serves as great, real life evidence gathering for you SSE. Tracking the impact of their home-based challenges turns local data into a reflective tool.
By embedding Development Education into the SSE process, students don’t just audit lightbulbs; they critically evaluate why global energy inequalities exist, linking Irish energy poverty to global biomass reliance.
This approach to Development Education ensures students critically connect their local energy-saving data to broader global inequalities.
Hi Sarah,
Your reflection is very well thought out and provides an excellent template for how to use GenAI responsibly in the classroom. You clearly stated your educational purpose for 5th Class Geography and showed strong professional autonomy by adapting the AI’s recommendation (moving from a travel brochure to Google Slides) to better fit your learning intentions.
Your section on responsible AI use is a major strength—protecting student data privacy by omitting identifying details and vetting the content for accuracy and age-appropriateness represents excellent practice.
July 1, 2026 at 4:33 pm in reply to: Module 2: Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Education #247242Hi Tracey,
Thank you for your response. It is thoughtful and balanced, raising some excellent points that really highlight both the practicalities and the ethics of integrating AI into the classroom.
Grounding your reflection with the reminder that AI outputs must always be vetted by staff adds significant professional weight to your post. Your concerns regarding data privacy and the ethical implications of tracking devices were also incredibly valid and well-stated.
Hi Caroline
Thanks for your sharing. Connecting AI to workload reduction and paperwork management, ultimately freeing up valuable time for high-value tasks like individual and small-group interventions, shows that you value ways we as educators can be free ourselves to be more hands on.
Acknowledging that “honing prompts” is a skill required to achieve good results hits the nail on the head. Your honest inclusion of the relatable challenges faced—such as struggling to format progress comments with a positive spin or feeling isolated in the planning process—makes the reflection deeply authentic and deeply relatable for fellow educators.
July 1, 2026 at 4:01 pm in reply to: Module 2 – Designing Learning with Teach, Create and Teams #247213Hi Marguerite,
Thanks for sharing your reflection. I appreciate how you have a balanced approach to this AI tool. Acknowledging that it is a “good starting point” but requires contextual tweaking is highly appropriate approach. Your point on being more specific in asking the tool to differentiate tasks as well as identifying the need for concrete manipulatives for support and advanced problem-solving for extension shows strong pedagogical awareness.
Connecting the use of Copilot to the School Self-Evaluation (SSE) process is excellent. It shows a forward-thinking attitude toward reducing administrative burdens and focusing on data analysis.
Ending with the reminder that AI outputs must always be reviewed and adapted by staff is crucial and adds significant professional weight to the response. -
AuthorPosts