[Helen Ryan]

Hi Rose,

Welcome to the course and thanks for your engagement with Module 1.

Firstly, I’m delighted to hear you have picked up some great ideas already. The Tallest Tower is a great example of how we can very simply show injustice in our classrooms and really enable our students to critically discuss the feelings around it.

The “birth lottery” you describe in paragraph shows the stark realities of the injustices experienced by people all over the world. It perfectly captures how geographical chance dictates basic human opportunities like education and healthcare. You have also highlighted a crucial modern paradox: technology has made our world much smaller yet systemic inequality remains vast.

 

[Helen Ryan]

Hi Sarah, thanks for your engagement with Module 5 and for your reply.

Targeting SESE for Assessment for Learning is an excellent pedagogical decision, as subjects like History and Geography often lack structured tracking compared to core areas. Utilising Google Forms for digital exit tickets through Google Classroom creates a manageable way to gather real-time student feedback.

Automated data such as this provides objective, measurable digital evidence for your SSE , making it easy to identify learning gaps and explicitly document how you adapted your future lessons to support the children.

[Helen Ryan]

Hi Darragh, thanks for your engagement in this Module.

Your conclusion is spot on: AI is a powerful assistant but the teacher must always remain firmly in control. You have also perfectly captured the main anxieties shared across the primary sector. Your reaction to the classroom monitoring video is entirely justified; ensuring that data privacy remains ironclad and that surveillance never enters Irish education is very important.

Agreed, Immersive Reader as a built-in accessibility tool for dyslexia is excellent and utilising familiar platforms like Minecraft Education is a brilliant strategy for boosting engagement and strengthening home-school links.

[Helen Ryan]

Hi Fiona,
Your connection between data-driven assessment and reduced teacher admin workloads is spot on. You have also balanced this opinion perfectly by identifying the core AI challenges around privacy, bias and ethical use.

Re appropriate training, Oide, Technology in Education is an excellent national resource that provides an AI hub filled with guidance, webinars and short courses to help your school safely and confidently navigate AI for the whole school community.

[Helen Ryan]

Hi Naomi,

Your focus on using AI to personalise learning levels and reduce administrative burdens is spot on. However, your caution regarding GDPR and inputting sensitive child data is an essential reminder of our ethical duties.

Discovering Immersive Reader for supporting pupils with dyslexia is a huge win for promoting independent decoding. Your call for a practical guide on cost-effective, curated AI tools is an excellent suggestion that would benefit schools immensely during digital procurement!

[Helen Ryan]

Hi Martina,

Thanks for this reflection, undoubtedly, fear and particularly fear around digital technologies is very common place in schools. It is completely normal to feel apprehensive when comparing ourselves to “younger” generations. Your determination to stay open-minded is inspiring.
As an SET teacher, your instinct to deploy Immersive Reader for a pupil with dyslexia is fantastic, embracing this type of targeted tool proves that your unique pedagogical wisdom is what truly matters, far outweighing pure technical speed.

[Helen Ryan]

Hi Barbra, thanks for your response in Module 2.
I have to agree, the DEY have strides to make in ensuring teachers get appropriate CPD for this ever evolving technology. It is important that teachers have some baseline support with AI, understanding of its transformative potential for both classroom instruction and administrative efficiency is one thing but we need to be critical in our use and take a human centred approach always.
Immersive Reader is fantastic, it is an great practical tool for making text accessible and is especially great to support building reading confidence for diverse learners.

[Helen Ryan]

Hi Mark, thank you for engaging in this module.

The ability you have noted of Learning Accelerators like Reading Progress and Reading Coach to target specific barriers—such as dyslexia and EAL needs—highlights a brilliant blend of technology and inclusive pedagogy.

I agree, Immersive Reader is fantastic and allows for individual adjustments to font and language giving us a dignified, discrete differentiation.

Linking these tools directly to your SSE is an interesting insight; using the automated diagnostics from Reading Progress provides highly objective, baseline evidence allowing you as a school to accurately guide targeted literacy interventions and measure the impact of the same.

[Helen Ryan]

Hi Caoimhe,

Welcome to the course and thank you for engaging with this first Module.

I agree, recognising that technology should enhance rather than replace the professional judgment of the teacher perfectly aligns with the principles of our national educational frameworks. It positions digital tools as a powerful means to support human-led learning and assessment.

Utilising AI as a time-saving asset that reduces administrative paperwork so teachers can focus on direct pupil interaction is exactly where its value lies.

[Helen Ryan]

Hi Margaret,

Welcome to the course and thank you for your engagement in Module 1 and it is great to hear you are looking forward to this course.

Without a doubt, the heavy administrative workload of modern teaching alongside creating engaging learning experiences for Junior Infants is a real challenge.
Gemini and Copilot are fantastic modalities and your plan to draft long-term schemes of work is excellent. Your critical observation regarding the cafe posters is spot on; maintaining a strict “human-in-the-loop” approach to proofread and correct AI-generated spelling or grammatical errors is essential.

[Helen Ryan]

Hi Martina, welcome to the course and thank you for engaging with this Module.
It is entirely normal to feel overwhelmed after looking at Module 1 because the scale of these digital tools is massive! Hopefully engaging with this course will support you to feel less overwhelmed and more prepared!

Your idea to use tools such as Gemini or Copilot to navigate new curriculum changes and draft administrative guidelines is the perfect example of the balance needed between letting AI guide the groundwork and using your own professional judgment to tailor it.

[Helen Ryan]

Hi Fionnuala, welcome to the course!

Your observation about not being over reliant is key here. Looking instead at AI as a supportive tool to manage administrative workloads and create bespoke resources. The ability of AI to support teachers to take some of the heavy lifting away cannot be undermined.

Your idea to teach critical thinking through a “real vs fake news” approach is brilliant and it directly supports the <i data-path-to-node=”1,0″ data-index-in-node=”321″>Digital Learning Framework</i> goals around media literacy and critical engagement.

[Helen Ryan]

Hi Tracey, thanks for your engagement in Module 1.
Your distinction between what AI can scale and what it cannot measure—such as a child’s emotional growth and resilience, shows exactly why we need to approach AI with a critical outlook.
Your idea to support students to critique AI outputs fosters independent learning, active digital citizenship and necessary higher-order critical thinking.

[Helen Ryan]

Hi Sarah, thanks for your engagement in Module 4.
Using the Brainstormer Gem to bridge historical exploration of the Great Famine with the novel <i data-path-to-node=”1,0″ data-index-in-node=”162″>Under the Hawthorn Tree</i> is great. Your decision to adapt the newspaper front page into a collaborative paired task, complete with a structured feature checklist, provides fantastic scaffolding for fifth class.
Verifying the historical accuracy against reliable sources and maintaining strict data privacy boundaries demonstrate professional practice. This perfectly illustrates how AI tools serve as valuable planning tool that still rely entirely on teacher judgment to refine lessons and elevate pupil learning experiences.

[Helen Ryan]

Hi Carol, thanks for your reply.
The use of the Brainstorm Gem to explore surface area for sixth class aligns with the hands-on, inquiry-based goals of the new PMC.

Your professional judgment in accepting the concrete cereal box net activity while rejecting the overlapping sticky notes idea is a perfect example of keeping a robust human-in-the-loop approach.

Not alone that but  your commitment to data privacy data boundaries by omitting identifying class details is spot on.

From an SSE perspective, leveraging Prebuilt Gems to brainstorm target interventions is a highly effective way to enhance pupil engagement and elevate classroom practice.

[Author]

Posts